Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Quality Costs for Consideration Essay
Our firm is the  manufacturer of tangible  proceedss. We, as a comp all, must  keep in line that we argon delivering the  higher(prenominal)est  spirit products to our clients to  prevent a  prime(prenominal) reputation and in order to earn   subscribe to over and referral business. We  lease identified the  collar types of  be associated with the  capital punishment of  superior considerations. We believe that if we  be mindful of the  pursual  be our  whole tone  leave alone improve, our customer  enjoyment will improve and our business will prosper. The three types of  constitutes associated with  whole tone considerations  ar prevention cost,  estimation costs,  intragroup and external  adversity costs. Prevention costs  be the most effective way to  head off unnecessary problems with production and sales quality. These costs are defined as any steps we as a company can take to pre-emptively  subdue any future defects by providing our employees with things such as,  kosher as wel   lls to complete their assigned work, safe and proper  work conditions, proper and effective  cookery of  only  youthful employees and continual training and education for all  exist employees, and by  weaponing quality control systems to ensure all products produced are up to the companys and customers quality standards. estimate costs are the costs associated with the testing and inspection of purchased materials used in the productions process, inspection of the items the company is producing, checking items produced for conformance, quality control audits and  knit stitch testing of items produced and the cost of the labor associated with all of these items. These costs are ultimately the quality costs  conclusioning from quality control and while they may be high in numbers but are  commanding during the manufacturing and production processes. Internal failure costs are the costs that we would incur should we fail to meet the quality standards of the products we produce. These c   osts encompass everything from the manufacturing of a  bad product to the downtime  go outing from a quality assurance problem. Scrap materials,  high-risk and rejected products are some example of internal failure costs incurred from a lack of quality assurance.External failure costs are the result of internal failure costs that somehow  fly recognition and end up with our customers. These costs are warranty repairs and replacements, lawsuits from  spoilt or dangerous products, a loss of referral and repeat business as a result of a battered reputation and any recalls the company may have to endure because of  amiss(p) quality assurance these costs will  unavoidably cause the most damage as our defective products have reached the product and that is where the problem is realized. The time, money and  safari needed to overcome an external failure cost is astronomical and can even become a threat to the companys very existence. An military rating of these costs allows us to analyze t   he trade-offs for each and why it is so important for us, as a company, to maintain high quality control standards.Preventative costs may be substantial to the company during the  sign implementation period because the company may have to update equipment or hire appropriate training managers for our employees but we believe that if we implement these preventative measures the benefits will far outweigh the costs for the company. The  trade-offs if we decide  non to take preventative measures we will be  opening night our processes up for internal failure which will result in lost time, wasted product and  disquieted customers from late deliveries. We believe this cost will  hit our employees morale and increase our costs  overall for the reasons stated above which will deteriorate our margin.Appraisal costs may be numerous in the manufacturing industry and during the production process but the tradeoff for  non implementing these appraisal costs is far too great to accept from a co   st, benefit perspective. The tradeoffs for not implementing these costs are the use of bad  mad materials during production resulting in poorly produced items, products that are not uniformly produced defective products which will ultimately be returned or worse cause harm to the allocator or even customer. We would lose business, lose referrals and  maybe even lose suppliers if we do not implement appraisal procedures and we, as a company cannot  sacrifice liabilities that would be a direct tradeoff for not implementing appraisal costs. Internal and external costs, we believe, can be the end of the company if we do not take preventative action now.We leave ourselves open for judicial proceeding from faulty products that reached our customers and were injured, the cost of recalling faulty merchandise which requires us to pay for shipping and to replace any defective product that we sold. We also open ourselves up for  existence ridicule and loss of repeat and referral business from    a battered reputation. For all these reasons we believe that the company  necessarily to act now to implement a quality control system, implement preventative measures starting at the training phase of our new employees and monitor our  turnout carefully by auditing our processes and products regularly to help us avoid internal failure and external failure costs as a company.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.